23 Comments

  1. I think the fish eye lens (or whatever it’s called) distracts from the garments tbh and makes it harder to see the design

    Not a fan tbh

  2. She’s always had brilliant magazine covers and shoots. Could easily have been a model.

  3. Disastrous_Animal_34 on

    High fashion Riri out of nowhere!! Does this signal Met Gala attendance??

    I LOVE the porcupine cover and whatever the hell is happening in pic 3.

  4. Own-Importance5459 on

    Honestly I love how dramatic her photoshoots are! Also it was really special she put Rocki in with her!

  5. totallycalledla-a on

    Hate a fish eye lens booooo 🍅🍅🍅

    The cover and the porcupine ones are lovely though.

  6. Something about the way she’s holding her; says accessory and not baby, like it almost feels like it’s just a random baby they told her to hold for the picture lol

  7. Candid_Initiative_49 on

    I assume these are photos by Tim Walker, who’s been experimenting with the fisheye lens for a while now (he shot one of Harry Styles’s albums cover). I’ve been a fan of his work since around 2006 but this particular shoot does not showcase his artistry, I think. Some shots are too dark, sometimes Rihanna gets lost in the background, … he can take such beautiful pictures (please do check them out) that this feels like a miss 🙁

  8. Serpentongue on

    She’s going to be complaining about her kids lack of privacy and online photo presence as soon as the media cycle for new new album ends

  9. UntimelyGhostTickler on

    Pic 2 is the leftovers looking me after 2 days in the sink if you put something else on top.

  10. UntimelyGhostTickler on

    Pic 2 is the leftovers looking me after 2 days in the sink if you put something else on top.

  11. TheAnxiousPangolin on

    This photo shoot is not it. Rhianna is beautiful but these photos (in my opinion) don’t showcase any of her best features!

Leave A Reply