Share.

9 Comments

  1. allanjameson on

    It just doesn’t sound appealing to me. I didn’t care for that Ralph Fiennes part in 28 Years Later

  2. That 3rd part is so not getting made unless they cut the budget in half. And even then its not really sure it would be enough.

  3. mizumi_heiwa on

    I just wanna know tho, how many debut views is considered “good”?

  4. Netflixers on

    I should add one thing that is different for 28 years later: The Bone Temple compared to the other Sony films on the graph: all the other ones were locked for the ad tier subscribers while 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple was the second new Sony film to be unlocked for all Netflix subscribers in the US. So it probably had a boost because of that but that did not help it much.

  5. I will never understand why this wasn’t marketed better.

    It was better than 28 Year Later in every way, especially Jack O’ Connell as the villain Jimmy.

    Absolutely none of my friends knew this film existed until I told them it does.

  6. Subtleiaint on

    Are you Frederick? 

    I’m really interested in this. I’d also be really interested in a ‘the numbers’ type database website. I’d love to be able to compare Nielson film data across platforms.

  7. Puppetmaster858 on

    Brutal man, with it struggle in theaters and on Netflix I sadly don’t think we’re gonna get the last one which is such a bummer cuz these movies rule

Leave A Reply