Bustle highlights differences in lighting in original movies and tv shows and their sequels/reboots

by mcfw31

9 Comments

  1. JennaElizabethAdams on

    They’re not wrong. Lighting back then was so much brighter and almost crisper if that makes sense.

  2. NanoCurrency on

    There must be an economic reason for this, right? Do they know the audience prefers more light?

  3. Pale_Possibility5083 on

    Hollywood thinks they cracked the code for turn and burn production eliminating any artistry in lighting and cinematography. Also using digital doesn’t help anything.

    Nowadays it’s about doing things fast and cheap to please corporate stakeholders. 

  4. Lances_Looky_Loo on

    Fix the lighting, the lenses, the set decoration and PLEASE start using miniatures (within reason) again!

  5. 1. The Netflix lighting is commonly used because it’s a lot more flattering to older actors. These are women in their 60’s, so of course they light them to try to make look like they are 15 years younger.

  6. Unusual-Ad4890 on

    Netflix lighting is a plague. Even if you skimp on film and go digital, it can still have nice natural lighting. Robert Eggers has shown that time and again. It’s a lack of effort.

  7. Agreed 100%.

    Granted my living room is unique in how many windows it has and how bright it can be early afternoon, but there are plenty of times I literally have to change what I’m watching, because everything is too dark to see.

    I get some shows need darkness for atmosphere. I don’t expect everything to have sitcom lighting, but it’s pretty ridiculous how often I find I can’t watch a modern program or movie until it’s dark enough outside to see it.

Leave A Reply