Share.

    14 Comments

    1. Lmfao if this isn’t an example of the performative privilege of Hollywood, I don’t know what is.

      A lot of that stuff could have gone to shelters, or been donated, after simply etching out or removing the Swastikas.

      But no, let’s destroy them and make all of that material useless. And make sure the world knows about it so they know how good and virtuous we are!

      Destroy the system! (As long as you leave us alone).

      Edit: Damn, 20 downvotes in 2 minutes. “Anti-capitalist” Reddit really showing how seriously they value what they say lmfao.

    2. > Her wardrobe was so detailed that designer Catherine Adair sewed labels reading “made by Aryan hands” into the dresses, where a camera would never be able to see.

      I question the motive behind this kind of detail. It seems like the sort of thing you’d ONLY add if there was some chance they’d plan to film it at that level of detail or to add authenticity to sell the piece, but otherwise I’d think a small label is the perfect location for a “for film prop only, not for sale” sort of notice. Otherwise it seems like an inside joke and is kind of poor taste.

    3. obliviousofobvious on

      Apparently every piece was catalogued and the destruction was methodotical to make sure nothing got out.

    4. IrrelevantLeprechaun on

      Should have donated it to a museum. It’s important to learn from history no matter how controversial.

    5. I did a play about the far right movement. We had strict photo policies, and at the wrap party we burned all of the costumes. Yeah, it felt good.

    Leave A Reply