
Science teacher Ryland Grace (Ryan Gosling) wakes up on a spaceship light years from home with no recollection of who he is or how he got there. As his memory returns, he begins to uncover his mission: solve the riddle of the mysterious substance causing the sun to die out. He must call on his scientific knowledge and unorthodox ideas to save everything on Earth from extinction⊠but an unexpected friendship means he may not have to do it alone. Read Less
Director: Phil Lord, Christopher Miller
Cast: Ryan Gosling, Sandra HĂŒller, Ken Leung, James Ortiz, Milana Vayntrub
Rotten Tomatoes: N/A (updating)
Metacritic: N/A (updating)
Some Reviews (updating):
There are clichĂ©s that critics go back to, and when I realize Iâm guilty of overusing one (sometimes once can be too often), Iâll vow never to use it again. Hereâs one I did that with: lauding something as âthe movie we need right now.â Thatâs a phrase so cringe Iâm ashamed I ever used it. The reason I bring this up is that âProject Hail Maryâ is a cosmic adventure that feels diagrammed, if not programmed, to be The Movie We Need Right Now. It will likely be a hit, but the movie we need right now â or, really, anytime â is one whose drama extends beyond its ability to push our buttons.
AwardsWatch – Trace Sauveur – 'A-'
For their part, Lord and Miller are assured chaperones of all the disparate elements of design, both on Earth and in space. The pair know the kind of movie Project Hail Mary is meant to be â a pop blockbuster with an earnest approach, lovable characters, and formidable stakes â and pull it off with fluency, the work of directors who know their craft even at this expansive scale. They channel their giddy sense of spectacle in service of a story about the curious and enterprising human spirit, making it an encouraging watch in a contemporary political culture that dismisses scientific research. It may not be the next generational sci-fi classic, but Project Hail Mary will energize anyone desperate for studio blockbusters that revere something often lost in our biggest movies: the fundamental art of moviemaking.
BBC – Nicholas Barber – 4 / 5
Still, maybe Lord and Miller knew what they were doing when they went for such a bright and breezy tone. They've crafted a sci-fi epic which is more than two-and-a-half hours long, and which is a one-man show for much of that time. They have filled it not with action, but with mind-stretching concepts, painstaking laboratory research and knotty technical puzzles. To do all that and keep things zippily entertaining throughout is an extraordinary achievement. Besides, as jaunty as it is, Project Hail Mary is radical in its own way. The fate of humanity, it suggests, might not rest on fighting, but on knowledge, intelligence, communication and collaboration. No wonder the film is already being tipped for next year's best picture Oscar.
Project Hail Mary rocks. It is pure joy. Itâs hilarious, heartfelt, hugely moving, wildly exciting, and absolutely beautiful. We think itâll go down not just as one of the best films of the year but maybe even, in time, as a potential sci-fi classic. And thatâs if you already know what the story is and how it ends. Surely, itâs even better if you donât.
For All Its Adorable Intentions, Ryan Gosling's Alien Buddy Movie Fails to Land. Goslingâs efforts in this movie are valiant, as they tend to be: he does comedy prat falls, trepidatious space walks, and delivers as best he can the not especially hilarious script, which is bogged down further by excessive exposition of pretend science and plot rationale. And he really wants us to feel â desperately feel â the way Grace does about his new friendship with a CGI creature who looks like the lovechild of Makka Pakka from In The Night Garden and a fidget spinner. (The fact that Rocky doesnât have the soulful eyes of Hooch the French Mastiff or Clyde the Orangutan â or, in fact, any eyes at all â certainly doesnât help.) I know Iâve made the point already, but really, Iâm as shocked as anyone not to have been won over by this film. When it comes to Gosling, there is not an SNL monologue or a surprising-Eva-Mendes-on-her-birthday Jimmy Fallon appearance or a viral interview with a journalist stranded in the desert that I will not watch and be utterly charmed by. And yet, even with his magnetism set to hyperdrive, Gosling canât make this wannabe-feel good film dazzle the way it wants to. It pains me â desperately pains me! â to say it, but in my eyes (sorry to rub it in, Rocky), Project Hail Mary is a well-intentioned miss.
Cinemotic – Piers Marchant – 2 / 5
As with the previous adaptation of Weirâs work, itâs a film that gleefully presents basic scientific principles and logic clumsily sewn together with a story and outlook that feels very much like something an enterprisingly affable 15-year-old might come up with while daydreaming in Physics class. The film too often defaults to this sort of cringey geniality, a simplistic view of human emotional mechanics that renders the drama toothless. Like a warm-hearted kidsâ Disney movie, you know full well things will turn out just fine for our heroes, and the galaxy theyâre defending, because the film constantly telegraphs its cheerful intentions. Itâs as if Lord and Miller (and Weir) are afraid of making the audience feel real anxiety or stress, so like a second-grade teacher explaining the concept of greenhouse gasses with their students, they work very hard to let all of us know everything will work out okay. Itâs certainly not the worst quality in a film, but its lack of stress well belays its extended run time (156 mins), and makes for an unsatisfying experience: My parents saved the Cosmos and all I got was this lousy t-shirt.
NextBestPicture – Daniel Howat – 9 / 10
"Project Hail Mary" feels, in many ways, like a miracle of a movie. It combines the technical awe of âGravity,â the problem-solving exhilaration and humor of âThe Martian,â and the sweeping emotion of âInterstellarâ into one film with its own unique style and charm, crafting a new science-fiction space epic that celebrates the bravery in all of us, our capacity to do the right thing in the face of overwhelming odds, and our faith in science to lead us toward a better future, whether itâs on Earth or somewhere far beyond it. Ryan Gosling delivers one of his finest performances in years, commanding what is essentially a one-man show that will have you laughing one moment and crying the next. Daniel Pembertonâs score is immaculate as it reaches for the stars and finds that transcendent quality that lifts the film into a state of pure wonder. The shifting aspect ratios of Greig Fraserâs camerawork bring both intimacy and scale in equal measure. All of these elements and more come together under the assured, visionary direction of Phil Lord and Chris Miller, who have brought a beloved book to the big screen in a crowdpleasing cinematic experience many will feel, cherish, and not soon forget.
The Guardian – Peter Bradshaw – 3 / 5
Perhaps refreshingly, the film doesnât aim for the stunned awe and rapture of, say, Christopher Nolanâs Interstellar or even Jon Spaihtsâ underrated Passengers, but it does have the classic sci-fi spacecraft tropes: the huge, mysterious architecture with its vertiginous tunnels in which legacy pop music is played to soothe the inhabitants. This is a Hail Mary pass that Gosling just about manages to catch.
The Hollywood Reporter – David Rooney
Lord and Miller have just the right lightness of touch combined with depth of feeling and technical control to bring this material to life, and the right love of vintage movie craft to make it a universe we can almost reach out and touch. What a pleasure to have them back in the directorâs chair after too long away.
RogerEbert – Robert Daniels – 2.5 / 4
Itâs an enjoyable, yet overly familiar, excursion. By disavowing narrative and aesthetic boundaries, âProject Hail Maryâ struggles to become boundless. The harder the film tries, the more one feels pulled along rather than effortlessly transported.Â
by ChiefLeef22
21 Comments
I’m convinced that this is the movie that the world needs right now. I read the book during the pandemic, having received it as a gift, knowing nothing about it. I felt so hopeful and and peace for such a long time after reading it.
Sounds like a hit to me!
Wow Piers did not like
Please be good.
Can’t wait to watch this
Amazing book. Can’t wait for this movie.
The fact that Cinemotics critic justified his rating by saying itâs similar to the Martian kind of disqualifies it for me. The Martian is nothing like how he described, so it makes it hard to take him seriously.
[deleted]
I really like The Martian (book and movie), but as soon as I finished reading PHM, I immediately thought this one is made to be a much bigger hit movie
This feels like a good movie in a very safe studio-ish kinda way which im not personally too excited by but ill see it anyway.
>Hereâs one I did that with: lauding something as âthe movie we need right now.â Thatâs a phrase so cringe Iâm ashamed I ever used it
Surprising to see a nearly 70-year-old man earnestly using, and fretting about, the term “cringe.” (While at the very same time ironically rambling about how much he dislikes cliches.)
Interesting that it features music played in tbe ship. I thought that was the biggest gap in tbe book. You havr a creature that uses sound to understand the Universe and outside of a couple of Beatles references they never talk about music? Seemed like a huge gap.
Piers review sounds like those wanna-be cool reviews on Reddit đŹ
Hated the book but the whole time I thought it would make a great popcorn film, so I have high hopes for this.
Loved the book. Love Gosling. Love Lord & Miller. I read the book before the movie was announced and Iâm very excited to see Rocky portrayed on screen. Canât imagine Iâll be disappointed seeing this in theaters, already expecting it to be a top 5 film of the year for me.
So itâs good.
if you reviews says itâs not as good as âThe underrated Passengersâ you probably shouldnât be reviewing movies.
Your selective cutting of the variety review is a bit… Uh. Yeah. Gives the impression they liked it.
Being a bit more honest:
>So forgive me if I say that itâs not a very good movie. Thereâs certainly an abstract commercial grandeur to it. I saw it on an IMAX screen (it will open on many of those), where it becomes the kind of bedazzling warm bath your eyeballs can sink right into. But hereâs the rub. âProject Hail Maryâ is way too long (two hours and 36 minutes), because thereâs not much variation to it. Itâs baggy and incredibly derivative of movies youâve seen before â like âInterstellar,â from which it lifts the premise of a space voyage as the last chance for human survival (in this case, the sun and other stars are dying, which means that weâve got to travel to the lone star that isnât in order to figure out why).
>More crucially, everything to do with the onboard alien is far too cute and formulaic. We donât think so at first, because his spacecraft is a daunting dazzler (it looks like a giant oil rig made of pick-up sticks), and the creature doesnât have one of those beguiling faces. In fact, it has no face at all. Itâs made of rock (it looks like the Thing recast as a five-legged spider), with a flat slate where its features should be. How will Ryland and the alien, who he nicknames Rocky, communicate? By mimicking each otherâs body poses. Then by hooking the alien up to a computer, which translates his thoughts into one-liners that, within half an hour, are adorable enough to be sitcom-worthy. I should add that there are hugs. Too many of them. âProject Hail Maryâ never stops figuring out ways to make you fall in love with it.
thanks for the spoiler intro
I saw the movie last night. It’s an absolute masterpiece.
Faithful to the book. Story is Incredible. Acting is incredible. Soundtrack is incredible. 10/10
I was worried about the 2/5 for a second, then I noticed he didnât like The Martian either.